<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Franken Amendment, elitism&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starkreports.com/2009/11/14/more-on-franken-amendment-elitism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starkreports.com/2009/11/14/more-on-franken-amendment-elitism/</link>
	<description>Unscripted, unvarnished and unedited</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Manamongst Hussein</title>
		<link>http://www.starkreports.com/2009/11/14/more-on-franken-amendment-elitism/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Manamongst Hussein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starkreports.com/?p=170#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Also find a publicist, get celebrities that a conservative might think are conservative but really aren&#039;t.  Progressive country music stars or just stars, you would be surprised what those Hollywood bashing conservatives will do when a real star gets around them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also find a publicist, get celebrities that a conservative might think are conservative but really aren&#8217;t.  Progressive country music stars or just stars, you would be surprised what those Hollywood bashing conservatives will do when a real star gets around them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manamongst Hussein</title>
		<link>http://www.starkreports.com/2009/11/14/more-on-franken-amendment-elitism/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Manamongst Hussein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starkreports.com/?p=170#comment-237</guid>
		<description>As a person who has followed you since callingallwingnuts, I would have to agree with you wholeheartedly.  I would propose doing what the Cheetos eaters on the right do...only better.  Tap one of the, still rich in this recession ?illionaires draw up a grant proposal, show them your work.  This is also an in to wire services and press secretaries.  Money is important, it allows you to stay one step ahead of the silent opposition and their problem fixers.  They will be an issue, I know it doesn&#039;t seem like it at this point, but it will.  Funding will allow you time and resources to delegate things that are/will keep you from your family and basic comforts.  For example imagine, at some point you will have to address the issue of the &#039;politician on the move&#039;, or the &#039;politician running late&#039;.  Resources allow you to either be in a place more conducive to having a captive interviewee or to 
people being introduced the politicians will feel compelled to stop and talk to.  How many politicians would balk at the opportunity to mix it up with supposedly like-minded constituents on camera?

Additionally, the way you ask questions is the most unique aspect as well.  You have the gift of restraint at the right time, and most importantly you&#039;re not pressed.  Politicians have confidence that they can always escape, and are never taunted.  In my opinion, it seems to be the bluedogs or the suspiciously disloyal Dems who seem to be the most fearful.  I would suggest learning a bit more inside info on the individuals something they would consider good news, or mood lifting.  And/or lead with something unrelative to politics.  Some would call it a &quot;lay-up&quot;, but behaviorist or professional interrogators, statement takers and even polygraph administers call it contrasting...setting an emotional, non-verbal and attitude baseline.  It only ends up highlighting their subsequent flight when the real questions come.  Mixing hard hitting questions and fluff with the skill of a &quot;Simon Says&quot; anouncer is the key.  There are some that will never play, they know they are out matched and they know they are wrong and desperately need their parallel universe bubble of reality...Virginia Foxx of NC 5th comes to mind.  For this brand of politician the online community must join and help, we are truely lacking in actionable intelligence on candidates outside of what anyone could find on Wikipedia.  Can her ice be melted...or is she even a joke to even try?  She knows she can&#039;t be trusted to talk to the likes of you.  I dare say it would be comedy gold.  As organizations band together to finally help you and others like you I hope that everyone with the possibility of helping can be employed.

Good Luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a person who has followed you since callingallwingnuts, I would have to agree with you wholeheartedly.  I would propose doing what the Cheetos eaters on the right do&#8230;only better.  Tap one of the, still rich in this recession ?illionaires draw up a grant proposal, show them your work.  This is also an in to wire services and press secretaries.  Money is important, it allows you to stay one step ahead of the silent opposition and their problem fixers.  They will be an issue, I know it doesn&#8217;t seem like it at this point, but it will.  Funding will allow you time and resources to delegate things that are/will keep you from your family and basic comforts.  For example imagine, at some point you will have to address the issue of the &#8216;politician on the move&#8217;, or the &#8216;politician running late&#8217;.  Resources allow you to either be in a place more conducive to having a captive interviewee or to<br />
people being introduced the politicians will feel compelled to stop and talk to.  How many politicians would balk at the opportunity to mix it up with supposedly like-minded constituents on camera?</p>
<p>Additionally, the way you ask questions is the most unique aspect as well.  You have the gift of restraint at the right time, and most importantly you&#8217;re not pressed.  Politicians have confidence that they can always escape, and are never taunted.  In my opinion, it seems to be the bluedogs or the suspiciously disloyal Dems who seem to be the most fearful.  I would suggest learning a bit more inside info on the individuals something they would consider good news, or mood lifting.  And/or lead with something unrelative to politics.  Some would call it a &#8220;lay-up&#8221;, but behaviorist or professional interrogators, statement takers and even polygraph administers call it contrasting&#8230;setting an emotional, non-verbal and attitude baseline.  It only ends up highlighting their subsequent flight when the real questions come.  Mixing hard hitting questions and fluff with the skill of a &#8220;Simon Says&#8221; anouncer is the key.  There are some that will never play, they know they are out matched and they know they are wrong and desperately need their parallel universe bubble of reality&#8230;Virginia Foxx of NC 5th comes to mind.  For this brand of politician the online community must join and help, we are truely lacking in actionable intelligence on candidates outside of what anyone could find on Wikipedia.  Can her ice be melted&#8230;or is she even a joke to even try?  She knows she can&#8217;t be trusted to talk to the likes of you.  I dare say it would be comedy gold.  As organizations band together to finally help you and others like you I hope that everyone with the possibility of helping can be employed.</p>
<p>Good Luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odds and ends, Nov. 17 &#171; Blog on the Run: Reloaded</title>
		<link>http://www.starkreports.com/2009/11/14/more-on-franken-amendment-elitism/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Odds and ends, Nov. 17 &#171; Blog on the Run: Reloaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starkreports.com/?p=170#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] speaking of Richard Burr, call the WAAAAmbulance. Apparently, Senate Republicans are concerned that TV commercials about them supporting government contractors who let their employees get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] speaking of Richard Burr, call the WAAAAmbulance. Apparently, Senate Republicans are concerned that TV commercials about them supporting government contractors who let their employees get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.starkreports.com/2009/11/14/more-on-franken-amendment-elitism/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starkreports.com/?p=170#comment-229</guid>
		<description>So did you file a complaint against Cornyn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So did you file a complaint against Cornyn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M</title>
		<link>http://www.starkreports.com/2009/11/14/more-on-franken-amendment-elitism/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starkreports.com/?p=170#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

You are on to something here. Every legislator should be buttonholed every day. Votes, committee hearings, junkets. Popular bills and the esoteric. This way they know that they will be held accountable and we get civics lessons.

I seem to recall that this what journalism is about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>You are on to something here. Every legislator should be buttonholed every day. Votes, committee hearings, junkets. Popular bills and the esoteric. This way they know that they will be held accountable and we get civics lessons.</p>
<p>I seem to recall that this what journalism is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reading Around on November 12th through November 14th &#124; B12 Solipsism</title>
		<link>http://www.starkreports.com/2009/11/14/more-on-franken-amendment-elitism/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Reading Around on November 12th through November 14th &#124; B12 Solipsism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starkreports.com/?p=170#comment-222</guid>
		<description>[...] More on Franken Amendment, elitism… at StarkReports.com &#8211; In an effort to increase my ability to do this kind of reporting, I&#8217;ve exchanged contact information with several Democratic Press Secretaries. I&#8217;ve explained that I am a progressive news service and that my goal is to quench a thirst for timely progressive news… that it&#8217;s not enough to complain about Fox, Nedra Pickler, John Solomen or an inability to get your message out… that growing a progressive media requires cooperation from the news-makers that want to see the progressive media grow… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More on Franken Amendment, elitism… at StarkReports.com &#8211; In an effort to increase my ability to do this kind of reporting, I&rsquo;ve exchanged contact information with several Democratic Press Secretaries. I&rsquo;ve explained that I am a progressive news service and that my goal is to quench a thirst for timely progressive news… that it&rsquo;s not enough to complain about Fox, Nedra Pickler, John Solomen or an inability to get your message out… that growing a progressive media requires cooperation from the news-makers that want to see the progressive media grow… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
